Previous Entry | Next Entry

Star Trek: The Writers' Dialogues

  • May. 11th, 2009 at 9:49 AM
Plot Bunny
Let me make this clear up front: I enjoyed the latest Trek movie. It was a fun little SF romp. I didn't love it the way a lot of folks seem to, but I did like it. Karl Urban as McCoy was my favorite, but I found myself liking most of the newly reinvented characters. I'm also impressed at how well the movie accomplishes precisely what it's supposed to: rebooting the series and clearing the way for new stories. A parallel universe storyline allows all of the old Trek histories and movies to stand unchanged while our young actors go forth to tell the Trek stories of this universe.

With that said, can we please get an actual writer to help with the next one? Maybe a scientist too, while we're at it. I know Star Trek has not been known for its rigorous adherence to scientific fact, and some of the stories get a little silly in terms of plotting. People are already telling me "Just ignore the silliness and enjoy it!" But there's just too much. It got me thinking about what must have gone on during the writing and rewriting process....

Warning: there be spoilers ahead.


I have no idea who was actually helping with the writing and revisions. Therefore all writers shall be referred to as Bob.

#


JJ: I think we need more action in this scene. Bring out the Wheel of Plot Twists!

Bob (sheepish): We still haven't recovered the Wheel of Plot Twists. We're pretty sure Rick Berman swiped it. We've got people searching, but--

JJ: So what do we have?

Bob: I'm afraid we're stuck with the Coin of Plot Twists. Heads, Kirk gets his ass kicked. Tails, someone falls off a random ledge and dangles by his fingertips.

#


JJ: We need a way for people to create random black holes.

Bob: I've got a phone call in with several leading astrophysicists, and--

JJ: Forget them! I've got a better idea. What if Spock comes back in time with Happy Fun Ball?

Bob: ...

JJ: It's perfect! Every time someone pokes Happy Fun Ball, it creates a little black hole.

Bob: ...

JJ: Just remember to give it a fancy scientific name so the Saturday Night Live people don't sue us.

#


JJ: So in this scene, Kirk's running away from a random snow monster. Kirk's unarmed, and he can't make it back to his escape pod. Then, just when he's about to be gobbled up, an even bigger and uglier monster bursts from the snow and eats the first one. Kirk gives us his trademark grin, then says "There's always a bigger--"

Bob: Dude, you totally stole that from Star Wars.

JJ: Did not!

Bob: For God's sake man, you're ripping off The Phantom Menace! Can't you at least steal from one of the good Star Wars films?

JJ: How dare you! You're fired! Send in another Bob. Waits while the next Bob enters. All right, now in this scene, Sulu whips out the hilt of a sword and presses a button, and then the blade magically springs to life!

#


Bob: I'm confused. Spock Prime is on this snow planet that isn't Hoth, within walking distance of a Starfleet outpost. He knows Nero is going to destroy Vulcan. Why doesn't he do anything?

JJ: Don't worry, the audience will be too swept up in the action to think about it. If you don't think that's enough, we can always do another hilarious shot where Kirk's hands swell up again.

Bob: I swear to Roddenberry, I'll use the Vulcan death grip on you.

#


Bob: So exactly how long does it take to get from Earth to Vulcan?

JJ: Less than twelve parsecs!

Bob: Right. We'll ... we'll just wing it.

#


Bob: So Scotty's equation for transwarp beaming lets them beam from not-Hoth directly to the Enterprise.

JJ: Exactly! It solves a knotty plot problem while demonstrating Scotty's engineering brilliance at the same time.

Bob: How do they know where the Enterprise actually is?

JJ: Question not the equation. It's space that moves!

Bob: I'm pretty sure the Enterprise is moving too.

JJ: It's Scotty's equation!

Bob: So why don't they just transwarp beam a couple of snow monsters onto Nero's ship?

JJ: Heretic! Thou hast questioned the equation! As punishment, thou shalt be banished to the gladiatorial pits of Triskelion!

#


JJ: So we'll have Kirk hit on Uhura here in the beginning--

Bob: Spock will kill him if he tries anything.



In the end, I liked the movie, but I really wanted to love it. I just wish I didn't have to lobotomize myself to get past all the gaping cracks in the story. It was fun SF action, but it didn't really feel like Star Trek to me. It's not just the different actors, either. World Enough and Time felt like Trek, despite the new cast. This didn't.

But I'll definitely go see the next one.

Tags:

Comments

( 86 comments — Leave a comment )
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
[info]stormsdotter wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 01:54 pm (UTC)
Jim, thanks for posting, I needed a good laugh today.
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:00 pm (UTC)
Glad I could help! :-)
[info]krenolds wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 01:55 pm (UTC)
Bob: So why don't they just transwarp beam a couple of snow monsters onto Nero's ship?

Okay, Jim, now you're just stealing from Galaxy Quest!
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:00 pm (UTC)
Hmph. That was a rock monster. I'm talking about snow monsters. Totally different.
(no subject) - [info]jagyr_ebonwood - May. 11th, 2009 02:22 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]krenolds - May. 11th, 2009 03:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jjschwabach - May. 11th, 2009 10:05 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]kaiweilau wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:09 pm (UTC)
That's interesting. My husband said something similar. He was of the opinion that it was a good summer action movie, only it was a fail as a Star Trek story. It didn't ask any deeper questions, the way that Star Trek was famous for.

I'm not a Trek fan, but I thoroughly enjoyed the movie.
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:12 pm (UTC)
Star Trek can certainly go too far with it, too. Plenty of their stories crossed from "raising question" over to "We will beat you to death with the preachy!"

This movie was fun fluff, and I'm the last person who should be protesting fluff. But I wanted it to be Fluff Plus.

Has your husband seen any of the New Voyages? World Enough and Time really was a good story, and if he's looking for that classic Trek feel, I'd suggest checking it out.
[info]j_cheney wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:09 pm (UTC)
The 'red matter' was extremely weak....I still loved the movie, but that was a hideous plot weakness.
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:12 pm (UTC)
Do not mock happy fun ball red matter!
(no subject) - [info]j_cheney - May. 11th, 2009 02:28 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]rowenablue wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:15 pm (UTC)
Completely off topic. Just saying hello. Stumbled across your journal and wanted to say how much I enjoyed Goblin Quest.
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:17 pm (UTC)
Thanks so much! Those are my favorite off-topic comments :-)
[info]cuthulu wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:45 pm (UTC)
You're forgetting
JJ: We need a large, massive object like a small moon, or a space station, that can shoot beam directly into a planet's core destroying it!

Bob: That's already been done...

JJ (Contemplates): Hmm... how about instead of shooting the beam directly we attach a drill to a giant ship that looks like Sovereign from Mass Effect. That shoots the beam and then BAM! we drop the red matter.
[info]krenolds wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 03:12 pm (UTC)
Re: You're forgetting
Yeah, that was the one point that really bugged me in the movie. If the red matter will make a singularity, why do you need the drill? Just plop the singularity down on the surface of the planet. There's no need to drill into the core at all.

Gravity. It's a bitch. (Except for that one lolcat that can levitate, and that other one that can walk on walls.)
Re: You're forgetting - [info]jimhines - May. 11th, 2009 03:50 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: You're forgetting - [info]livia_llewellyn - May. 11th, 2009 04:45 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: You're forgetting - [info]twilight2000 - May. 11th, 2009 05:28 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: You're forgetting - [info]livia_llewellyn - May. 11th, 2009 05:44 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: You're forgetting - [info]mela_lyn - May. 11th, 2009 06:07 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: You're forgetting - [info]jjschwabach - May. 11th, 2009 10:07 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]tsubaki_ny wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:54 pm (UTC)
That's been my misgiving for a while. (I read your spoiler section, but I don't feel too spoiled.) Even from the ads and promos... it feels like FUN, but not like Trek. (Possibly I should not have planned to see this after coming off a long "Next Generation" marathon culminating in "All Good Things...")
[info]matthewsrotundo wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:55 pm (UTC)
OK, so my review (SPOILERS GALORE) is a little heavier on the snark and a little lighter on the funny. But I believe we're pretty much on the same page.
[info]christinerains wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 02:56 pm (UTC)
I couldn't agree with you more. I had fun watching the movie if I ignored the plot. I was actually watching a show on History channel about Star Trek before I saw the film and they were talking about how much attention was paid to the science in the TV series. They obviously didn't pull out the scientists for that film, though.
[info]courtcat79 wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 03:04 pm (UTC)
Hee! I haven't seen it yet but I've seen every other Star Trek movie in existence, so I kind of figured on a lot of WTF, particularly with Abrams in charge. But OMG, now I want to see it more just so I can giggle in the appropriate places. And I'm a theater whisperer, too, so I'll poke the husband and say, "Jim says . . ." It'll be fun!
[info]cathshaffer wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 03:14 pm (UTC)
Ultimately, it's not the bad science that bugs me. I've come to expect that. I think it's exactly these plot/logic inconsistencies that hold this movie back from greatness. I did love it, but wish I could have somehow prevented myself from thinking about some of the assumptions and logical chains of events.

(Why did Spock bring SO MUCH happy fun ball back from the future? Isn't that kind of wasteful? By the way, the biggest logic problem I saw was the idea that somehow turning Romulus's sun into a black hole would made things better. Oy.)
[info]snapes_angel wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 04:09 pm (UTC)
Where Terror works, to celebrate the opening of the new Star Trek movie, They had a Star Trek trivia thing. Terror proudly announced that she answered every question with "It's a Tribble!" :p So they wre all having fun. The final question was addressed ot her of course, and the answer was "tribble".

She doesn't usually watch Star Trek, but has told me she may go see this one, because she hears that it appeals to more than just Trek fans.
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:14 pm (UTC)
It's definitely written to appeal to a broader audience, and I think it works really well in that respect.
(no subject) - [info]snapes_angel - May. 11th, 2009 10:01 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cathshaffer - May. 11th, 2009 08:00 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]snapes_angel - May. 11th, 2009 10:04 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cathshaffer - May. 11th, 2009 10:13 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]snapes_angel - May. 12th, 2009 12:15 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cathshaffer - May. 12th, 2009 01:05 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]snapes_angel - May. 12th, 2009 01:13 am (UTC) Expand
[info]tygerversionx wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 04:23 pm (UTC)
I liked it a lot. It wasn't the hot mess I'd been worried it would be, and I can cope with some of the inconsistencies.

Like: Nero had a mining ship. Nero wanted to cause lots of heartache and terror before the destruction actually happened. Thus, Nero uses his Space Drill.

And I think he probably beamed Spock Prime down to that planet just before. He wouldn't have had time to get to the Starfleet outpost, just time to watch the planet go squish.

Annnnnnnd...that's as far as I'm going to try to explain my logic leaps, as everyone's mileage may vary, and I worry I'm starting to sound like one of those fanboys who can't stand criticism.

...Personally, I'm sure this is all somehow the Tribbles' fault.
[info]desert_born wrote:
May. 13th, 2009 02:32 am (UTC)
not to mention that if you use a Space Drill on San Francisco, the San Andreas Fault goes kablooie and you have a flat West Coast. and a lovely glass crater where the Bay used to be.
[info]oneminutemonkey wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 04:24 pm (UTC)
Damn your Vulcan logic.

Despite the illogical moments and other flaws, we still thought it was a pretty awesome movie. Yeah, it doesn't take much to make us happy... :>

That WAS a lot of red matter. Given 1 drop can implode a planet, why'd they need a metric assload? Maybe less time manufacturing red matter, and they would have gotten to Romulus before it was destroyed to make room for a hyperspace bypass. :>

And how the hell did a monster like that evolve on a planet like that, anyway? That's one scene that really didn't seem necessary to me.

But anyway, it was nice to get a decent Trek film again. :>
[info]cathshaffer wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 08:01 pm (UTC)
I think the snow monster on "Hoth" scene is time that could have been used sewing up other holes.
[info]cathschaffstump wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 04:31 pm (UTC)
That pretty much covers most of the glitches.

So, being extraordinarily bent on revenge, Nemo waits 25 years for Spock Prime to show up, because, really, getting any kind of revenge without Spock Prime here to see it makes revenge pointless, and he can't destroy the Federation or Vulcan in the interim. Right?

'Cause...yeah.

For me, character love comes first, and then I sit and think about the plot. This one becomes summer taffy when you do.

Still thinking about Spock.

Catherine
[info]biomekanic wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 04:46 pm (UTC)
My reaction to the 1st snow monster on Not Hoth was, "it appears that the Cloverfield critter also comes in furry".
[info]laughingfalcon wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 07:34 pm (UTC)
*snort, giggle* Hahahahahahaha! "Cloverfield critter also comes in furry!" Oh, that is precious!
[info]agilebrit wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 04:53 pm (UTC)
Mine and the Hubby's reactions were basically: Dude, that was entertaining, but haven't they started releasing the Big Dumb Summer Action Movies a little early this year?

I'll probably have more to say about that when we go see "Wolverine" this afternoon.
[info]dr_phil_physics wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:25 pm (UTC)
Jim, it is patently obvious even to the casual observer that red matter is stable in vast vat-like quantities. It is only dangerous in tiny droplike amounts. It's like a negative explosive.

If you REALLY want to terrorize someone, you should therefore use NO red matter, because that would be like SO dangerous. (grin)

Dr. Phil
[info]galeni wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:34 pm (UTC)
All true, plus more. But it still gave me heroes and space and a touch of the hope and joy I had back during The Original Series in the 60s. So I'm relatively good with it.

(A tiny ball of Red Matter would have just looked silly. Must be Scary, not silly. Good enough reason for me while watching it.)

It sure beat a lot of movies I've seen, despite the holes you could drive a truck 1701-D through!
[info]thetathx1138 wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:42 pm (UTC)
here via stormsdotter
Me, I just want an explanation as to why neither Earth nor Vulcan have any planetside defense capable of destroying what amounts to a satellite dish on a chain.

Or just some snipers with some of those 9mm phasers, since apparently you can destroy the interference-creating energy beam with handguns.
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 08:00 pm (UTC)
Re: here via stormsdotter
Romulan subordinate: Captain Nero, sir! Our drill is offline again.

Nero: What now?

RS: A Vulcan child with a BB gun appears to have disabled it.

Nero: Inconceivable!

RS: Couldn't we, like, just lean out the airlock and toss the red matter down?

Nero: No! It must impact the planet core in order to create a more symmetrical implosion for Spock, who I abandoned on a nearby planet within convenient walking distance of a Starfleet base!

RS: Yes. About that, sir...
Re: here via stormsdotter - [info]thetathx1138 - May. 11th, 2009 08:56 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]anghara wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:46 pm (UTC)
[giggle]
you evil man I've yet to see it. Now I"ll be giggling my way through thinking of this...
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:53 pm (UTC)
Bwa ha ha ha ha!

I do think it's worth seeing, and I'm looking forward to where they go from here, now that they've established their continuity reset.
[info]mela_lyn wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:49 pm (UTC)
There are 2 more movies already in the making... well, planning to be made. I follow the Exec Producer of Wolverine and he said that they are talking about shooting them simultaneously, so I'm wondering what they story line witll be like...

But see, I had happily ignored most of the plot holes while enjoying the good one liners and homages (what I'm choosing to call them) to the actual series. I think it was fun and funny and a great set-up for a new series.

But the Spock on the snow world thing did bother me...
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 05:52 pm (UTC)
And with an entire planet to choose from, Kirk just happens to get beamed down within walking distance of Spock Prime? I can understand putting Kirk down close to the Starfleet base, but why would Nero put Spock Prime down in that exact same spot?

Definitely a fun movie, though.
(no subject) - [info]mela_lyn - May. 11th, 2009 06:06 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jimhines - May. 11th, 2009 06:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]mela_lyn - May. 11th, 2009 06:21 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]sarsly wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 06:10 pm (UTC)
I have to agree with you - and so does most of my family. We liked it, but, to put it as my sister did, there were some issues. This the consensus after we all saw it last night.

I did also get to the "midnight" show after driving home from college (and didn't actually have a ticket o_o) and sat with one of my longtime friends and we heckled. Because that's what we do:

Pike: "Romulus hasn't been destroyed!"
Me: *whisper* "It must have been Remus."

Also... the way they pronounced Uhura's name a few times? Crack-up.


Thanks for making my Monday a little better. :D
[info]jimhines wrote:
May. 12th, 2009 12:37 am (UTC)
Even the most beloved movies can be more fun with a good MST3K treatment :-)
[info]kenllama wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 06:57 pm (UTC)
*cackle*

Hoth. Exactly. I missed the Phantom Menace reference, having suffered traumatic amnesia from that whole episode.

and, oh gods, yes please: let us have a scientist next time -- or at least someone whose science is better than my own level of discernment.

my big issues:
1) we do not go through black holes. ever.
2) if Spock had killed the Romulan sun before it went supernova, what would that have helped. "We'll always have Romulus... or at least, some block of ice that used to be Romulus..."
[info]chris_gerrib wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 07:52 pm (UTC)
Romulus would freeze, but it would take a while - time to get everybody off.

Other holes? Many.
(no subject) - [info]cathshaffer - May. 11th, 2009 08:38 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jimhines - May. 12th, 2009 12:36 am (UTC) Expand
[info]laughingfalcon wrote:
May. 11th, 2009 07:43 pm (UTC)
Swiss Plot
Oh, thank you Jim! I forgot to add the bits about the snow beasts. And I didn't mind the red matter device, just its name. It doesn't have to so hard you can't pronounce it, but dark matter, anti-matter, oh-hey I know! We'll call it red matter didn't quite work.

But did anyone see the biggest plot hole of all? If you REALLY cared about your planet and you found yourself in the past, wouldn't you go there and let them know they needed to make plans to evacuate? HMMMM? YOUR PLANET WILL STILL DIE IF YOU DON'T TELL THEM!! And who's going to help them when you ate all the people who might care.

Oh, and I agree wholeheartedly that the new McCoy. He's the best. But the casting was quite good all around, they just need to stop stealing "the good bits" from other movies and talk to a REAL writer for the next one. :)
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
( 86 comments — Leave a comment )