This is one of my least favorite questions, and the one I’m asked most often. The best times are when parents tell me they’ve read the book, but still ask me whether it’s appropriate for children. Yes, this has really happened. On more than one occasion.
Should your kid read my book? How the frak should I know? Some parents let their kids read the pop-up Kama Sutra at age six. Others think The Cat in the Hat will turn their children into drugged-out hippies. (Some of Seuss’ more adult works, on the other hand … but that’s another topic.)
I understand parents are busy, and don’t have the time to prescreen everything their children read. Heck, I wouldn’t have wanted my parents to limit me to books they had read first. But as an author, it’s a lot easier for me to answer the parent who asks “Does your book have any graphic sexual imagery in it?” than it is “Should my kid read it?”
The first parent is asking about my book. The second is asking me to make a parenting decision for his or her child. I have no problem trying to help, but for all our sakes, please don’t be the second parent.
Clear enough? Groovy. Because now it’s time to list all the answers I’d like to give, but probably shouldn’t….
“Should my child read your book?”
- Can you prove that’s really your child?
- Yes, but only the odd-numbered pages.
- You mean the kid standing there playing Grand Theft Auto on his Nintendo DS?
- No! She should read my books, plural. How do you expect me to quit my day job if your lazy kid only reads one?
- Yes. When he’s finished, he can let you know whether or not it’s appropriate for grown-ups.
- How do you feel about nose-picking injuries, pixie pee, and gay fire-spiders?
- I’m sorry, Jim left an hour ago. I’m his decoy. His protection. His loyal bodyguard.
- Not without a prescription.
- Wil Wheaton said my book was cool! If you don’t buy it, he’s gonna march down to this bookstore and start throwing critical hits on your ass.
- Make sure she reads it backwards so she gets all the subliminal Satanic messages.
- You must be this tall to read Stepsister Scheme. But he can read the goblin books.
- Print is dead.
- Everyone knows kids prefer to read books about younger characters. Here, try this one by Nabokov.
- Sweet Zeus, what are you saying? Nobody can read these books! We have to keep the words trapped in the pages. Can’t you hear them screaming? Always screaming and plotting their horrible, horrible revenge. Don’t open that book! Don’t let them see you!!!
Please feel free to add your own.
Mirrored from Jim C. Hines.






Comments
I was gobsmacked. He'd just *heard* the level of violence in the book.
I pointed that out to him, and he bought the book. I wonder what that kid is doing now?
... So your book ended up being a teaching tool!
But then, maybe I'm a bad parent for wanting my child to think?
I'd be fine with my 8-year-old reading it as well, and I'd hope she'd do the same thing. Sadly, she hadn't yet gotten into her Daddy's books :-P
I am beginning to think that child bearing needs to be licensed. sigh
I adored them, but thought the sex scenes were boring. No, really, I didn't get the "grownup slumber party" when I was eight.
What can you take away from this? well, I think that to many adults worry about "appropriateness." Many things will go over children's heads, and if a child asks some questions, it's an opportunity to discuss things with them.
The kid was dumbfounded. "There was sex in that book???"
With each revision of the book I toned down the humour, until the properly published 2005 edition was relatively kid-friendly. I can blame this contact of mine for that, because I was highly embarrassed even though he though it was hilarious.
Nowadays, when people ask me whether my books are suitable for their kids, I ask them whether their kids are watching Doctor Who or Play School.
Asking what other books/shows the child is into is a good idea.
Check out my teen-action/adventure series by Hines & Strout entitled Perry Hotter & the Were-Jaguar of Misfortune!
(And in general, as a parent I'm far more likely to allow my children to read slightly more mature books than to let them watch television programs I consider inappropriate. Children will form their own visual images from a book based on their level of experience and exposure - I don't think it's *quite* as troublesome if they read something they weren't quite ready for because they'll likely ignore it or skim right past. And as I commented above, the chance to use a book as a conversation tool is really valuable. Television or movies, however, sometimes offer a level of visual intensity that might really bother a child who isn't ready for it. Jmho.)
I keed, I keed.
Every kid reacts differently to sex or violence. Caitlin (age 6) just zoomed through the LOTR films, watches Doctor Who, and enjoys Star Wars. Hell, I took her to see Mamma Mia in the theatre (which had *gasp* a bum shot of a guy), and we'll likely take her to Star Trek.
We draw the line between "adventure" and "gory" violence(no Tarantino or John Woo films anytime soon, ferexample, although Jackie Chan, Robin Hood, and Xena: Warrior Princess is fine).
Romance, though? Even a little nudity? Not a problem, so long as a *healthy relationship* of some kind is being modeled (and the genders of the people involved matter not in our household).
But that's *our* job. To make those choices. For our kid and her own reactions.
*sigh*
Parents are responsible for deciding how their own kids will be warped, until they deem their kids mature enough to warp themselves.
"Parents are responsible for deciding how their own kids will be warped, until they deem their kids mature enough to warp themselves."
I like this a lot.
I like the last answer in the list the most.
I have a similar list for parents who ask me dumb questions about why I want them to bring a rain coat on a rainy day for their child... and similar such questions.
I think I need a :headdesk: icon.
When I decided to suggest the fateful Chocolate War as 7th grade literature curriculum, every parent had to sign a permission slip because the book has some naughty language in it, and it had already been challenged by a parent.
Many parents were truly laissez faire. One parent who was very devout actually, said she wanted her kid to read the book with me, because she couldn't imagine anyone better to discuss some of the book's issues with her kid.
The other end of the scale are the parents who have decided to protect the entire community from Cormier's language by having the school ban the book. That's a whole 'nother level--deciding for OTHER families that their kids can't read the book.
Obviously, I feel the middle approach is best. Books can be a learning experience if there is guidance. I'm not a parent, but if I were, I wouldn't have any problem with having children read Stepsister, and discuss the issues therein.
Lines:
CAN your child read my book?
Only if you sign this liability form first.
I don't know. Do you want your child to think more than you seem to?
Grumble. The "Ban the nasty bookses" crowd is a whole other level of rant.
Ahahahaha, you nearly made me spray my breakfast all over my screen. I think that's my favourite one.
I had a conversation with one of my best friends not too long ago, both of us in our early 20s, about a book we'd both read when we were around 10. She'd completely gotten all the sex, and it had all gone right over my head. So it's completely an individual experience for each kid I think. And that being said, are either of us horribly scarred from our different experiences with that book? Nah. (Though oddly enough, I can't for the life of me remember right now which book we were talking about...)
I've heard similar stories to your own, that a lot of kids tend to just gloss over the scenes they either don't understand or aren't quite ready for.
Of course, that was in Germany.
And, of course, they might have invited me without reading the entire book first.
So, the question is: will they invite me back?
But basically most YA fiction (in German) is rather clear about babies not being found under gooseberry bushes. I am just reading a pirate adventure by German author Christoph Hardebusch "Sturmwelten" which is obviously aimed at 12-16 year olds, and the hero has had intimate relationships with two different women.
But maybe in Europe we are a little more unconcerned about these matters?
Very possible. Anecdotally that seems to be the case, though I don't have any hard research to confirm it.
Though I'm told young adult fiction tends to include more sexuality than I would have expected. I was reading a friend's YA book and came across a scene that made me blush as an adult. Not a bad thing, but not at all what I expected to find in YA.
I figured she'd be scared of some of the stuff in the Harry Potter books (she's at the beginning of Half-Blood Prince now), but what gave her nightmares was reading some of the Nancy Drew books that she's been given. Now our 8 year old... When he got to the end of Goblet of Fire when the Death Eaters popped out again, he set the book aside and declared that he was done for a while. (That "done" lasted about 6 months, btw.)
The best thing I could say is that it depends on the maturity level of the kid involved, and the parents ought to be the best judge of that. If they aren't or refuse to be, well...
FWIW, I think my oldest is ready for the Goblin books so far (haven't read Goblin War yet), but I think she's a year away from relinquishing her Disney-ized princesses and throwing herself into Stepsister. She would be utterly confused by the rape references there (it may take a year or two to comprehend those from human sexuality point of view as well), but I suspect the big hang up would be the holding onto those old princess notions. Not that I'd tell her "no" if she wanted to read it, but I think she'd just start and put it down until she was ready.
Oh, and thanks a bunch for sticking "Don't Stand so Close to Me" in my head with that Nabokov comment, Jim. I have to go find some Megadeth to drown the darn thing out.
I do think you're right about the princess books requiring a slightly more advanced reader than the goblins. The stories and characters are a little more complex, and there are references that I suspect would go over a younger reader's head.
I never censored my kids reading. If they were old enough to be interested in a book, they were old enough to read it. Books with ideas and concepts over their heads tended to bore them and they usually put those down on their own. Both my kids knew I'd talk to them about anything that might disturb them or that they didn't understand. As a result, both of them were reading on college level before junior high school.
I was sometimes the odd parent out when it came to books and considerably more liberal than the parents of my kids friends. But I truly believe the way to kill a child's imagination is to forbid them to explore and experience ideas outside their normal, everyday life. Books are the safest way for a child to do that.
I was much more worried about the violence in movies and video games, especially with my son, than I ever was with books.
And if they want to read a particular book, why would I discourage that? I want them to read. I might tell them what the book's about, if I don't think they understand what they're getting into. But take a kid who wants to read something and tell him/her no?
For some reason, DAW didn't put that one on the cover.
It worked too. I remember being about ten and picking up one of my mothers romance books. Ten pages into it and I ran to find a Fear Street that I hadn't read in a while.
I wish we could all chill out about the whole what-kids-are-reading thing. A bit of stray content of any sort isn't going to kill them--and if they really can't handle it, they'll likely put the book down.
It so much depends on the kids, doesn't it, and kids, themselves, know what they like. They'll put down a book if it's not for them. And if they enjoy it--fantastic!