The Sleeping God [Amazon | Mysterious Galaxy], by Violette Malan is a nifty book.
As heroic fantasy goes, this book has a fair amount going for it. Well-built world and mythology that fits together rather well, badass mercenary protagonists who are more than just caricatures, a sprinkling of secrets and intrigue, and of course, a sleeping god. Our heroes are mercenary brothers* Dhulyn Wolfshead and Parno Lionsmane, who take a job escorting a young girl back to her noble house but soon find themselves targeted by an ancient menace.
This is not the nifty I want to talk about.
What I loved about this book is the portrayal of Dhulyn and Parno’s relationship. This is a partnership in every sense of the word, built around a core of love and trust. As mercenary brothers, the two of them are bound to one another in a relationship as sacred as marriage.
Most fiction tends to show us the beginning of relationships, the eagerness and the passion and the fumbling and clumsiness as people learn more about one another. All too often, this leads to fairly predictable tension and conflict, misunderstandings and mistrust. The Sleeping God brings us a more mature relationship, and one of the healthiest relationships I’ve encountered in fiction. They talk to each other. They trust one another. They’ve got each other’s backs. They’re romantically involved, but the romance isn’t a neverending font of angst and drama.
I asked Malan about Dhulyn and Parno, and she responded:
“So often relationships, especially in fiction though not limited to that, seem to be based on the people not telling each other things. This is so often the basis of the relationship in romance novels and soap operas, for example (and consequently on the part of living people who think that’s how they’re supposed to act). My idea was to have two people who simply told each other what was on their minds instead of making a hullaballo about hiding things from each other. Of course, it did mean that the tension and the conflict had to come from elsewhere, but I think the story was the better for it.”
Don’t misunderstand. Malan doesn’t spend the whole book preaching about healthy relationships. What she does is show us the advantage of Dhulyn and Parno’s partnership. Individually, each of these fighters is pretty bad-ass. But put them together and they’ll whoop anything you care to throw at them.
I also liked that the characters go beyond being “just” fighters. Dhulyn is also a scholar, hunting for new books and theorizing about the evolution of children’s songs. Parno is … well, that would be telling. Suffice it to say, he’s also more than he first appears.
It took me a chapter or two to really get into the book, and the plot itself may be familiar to long-time fantasy fans. Mercenaries and ancient gods, dark priesthoods and scheming rulers … there’s almost an old-school fantasy feel to the book. But then, I enjoy old-school fantasy ;-) I’ll definitely be grabbing a copy of book two, The Soldier King [Amazon | Mysterious Galaxy].
For those of you who’ve read Malan’s work, I’d love to hear your thoughts. To the rest, what do you think about relationships in fiction? What are you tired of, and what would you like to see more of?
—–
*Brothers is used as a gender-neutral term. Dhulyn is female, while Parno is male.
Mirrored from Jim C. Hines.






Comments
Let me know what you think of the book!
(I always worry that I'm going to recommend a book and people are going to run out, buy it, hate it, and come back to vent their wrath on me for my review :-)
And I figure a review is just one person's opinion. If I decide to go get a book, it's still on me :-)
Is the relationship the central part of the story, or is it just part of the whole?
I just found their relationship to be incredibly refreshing ... in part *because* it's not the central source of drama and conflict in the story. Does that make sense?
And my sympathies on the reading pile :-) I don't have any other reviews queued up for the immediate future, if that helps!
Hey, at least having a decently sized queue means that I'll have something to look forward to in the evenings when I'm trying to forget about the stress of the workday.
One of the best epic fantasies I've read in a long time is "The Lies of Locke Lamora" by Scott Lynch. It's basically an epic fantasy heist book about a group of thieves who call themselves The Gentlemen Bastards. Great world building and characters who are clever, real, and complicated all at the same time.
My only quibble with it (and a lot of epic fantasy in general) is that there weren't any strong female characters. It was all guys, all the time ...
& I do get tired of people in books not telling each other things too. (I want to yell 'How can you be so *stupid*??' at them.)
And I sympathize with the desire to yell at certain characters :-)
That is strained some in Soldier King, but in a matter that works well with the story itself.
Well, yeah.
Thanks for posting this review!
I've been almost ecstatic reading several books recently where a relationship was A) not central to the plot, B) not angsted about. Doyle and Macdonald's original mageworlds trilogy; two characters get together in the first book like adults do, acknowledging interest and doing something about it, and stick together and play off each other for the rest of the books without "refusing to talk" or otherwise creating any artificial divides between them (disagreements, yes, but again, handled like real adults).
Similarly for Martha Wells' Wheel of the Infinite, which was more explicit on disagreement and culture clash, but had remarkably mature behaviour.
Naomi Kritzer tries to portray a deep sisterly bond in the Freedom/Dead Rivers trilogy, without it turning into a romance, but once in a while I think she slipped, and it gave off faux-romance signs, unnecessary angst, or the same kinds of flags as make most adolescent relationships in spite of the characters' ages. Still, ti was an interesting failure on that front.
I do want to see more good getting-along sibling relationships that feel like siblings as a focus, instead of romances. I want to see more adult romances or already-established relationships. And I want to see a lot LOT less of characters who lie to each other without a really good reason. A good story can still be got out of that (Mr. and Mrs Smith did okay...) but they're growing much fewer on the ground than the other kinds.
Relationships in fiction ... well, yes, enough already with the people who could work everything out in ten seconds if they would just talk to each other. (Well, though that can be mightily entertaining when it's played for laughs ...) The kind of romance plot I like best is the kind in which the protags fall in love, get together, and then must join forces to overcome obstacles, fight baddies, or whatever, which they are able to do, not necessarily in perfect harmony (because that would be boring) but without each going all emo with doubt about the other person's feelings for him/her -- in which they may not be able to count on anyone or anything else, but they know they can count on each other. (I've just been rereading Lois McMaster Bujold's "Sharing Knife" books, which are an excellent example of this.) I also like "one partner must rescue the other from grave danger through courage, smarts and perseverance" (à la Stepsister Scheme) quite a lot, provided the rescuee and the relationship seem worth it.
Revisions have eaten my brain, or I would have more to say on this topic ... and with fewer ellipses :P