While at Penguicon, whenever I used my phone in the lobby, it would try to connect to the local wireless networks, which means I was routinely greeted with this screen:
![]()
I don’t know the story behind the network names. I overheard one rumor that “rape rape rape rape rape” was an official Penguicon network. When I e-mailed someone on Penguicon staff, I was told it probably wasn’t, but they weren’t 100% certain. I haven’t yet gotten confirmation one way or another.
My guess is that someone was trying to be edgy and provocative. As sometimes happens, they overshot “edgy” and landed squarely in the “asshole” category.
There will always be people who try to be shocking and fail. I suspect this wasn’t an official Penguicon network, and was instead just a random cry for attention. (Though if it turns out that it was an official Penguicon network, I think that may be the last time I attend this con.)
ETA: Randy Bradakis, who is on the Penguicon ConCom and Board left the following comment (with the disclaimer that he’s not speaking for Penguicon as a whole here):
I can state firmly that this was not created at the request of the Penguicon ConCom, and that there will be discussions about both the reasons that this is unacceptable and how we can be certain that it is not repeated. While it might, in some specific in-joke sort of way, have been amusing to the creators at whatever other location it was created for, it is not the sort of “joke” that should be part of the Penguicon environment.
There are plans for more specific network requests for next year, and I will make it my recommendation that we at least have someone at the ConCom level give specific instructions to the networking staff about the image we wish to present.
I want you to know that I am deeply sorry for any offense that this caused. At any and all levels of future convention running that I am involved, I will strive to keep the idea of a safe and comfortable environment foremost in everyone’s mind, and encourage this behavior in my fellow Con-runners as well.
#
On a similarly annoying note, I’ve been reading The Becoming by Jeanne Stein. Within the first chapter, our heroine Anna Strong is attacked and raped by the bad guy, who turns out to be a vampire. I almost stopped reading right there, due to the “Let’s use rape to get this story started!” approach, but I’m trying to read more urban fantasy as context for my own work-in-progress.
I’m now more than halfway through the book. The word rape has vanished, and Strong’s character has now begun to refer to the incident as when a vampire had sex with her. (In addition, while our heroine is female, so far every other significant character has been male … but that’s a different rant.)
Writing about rape is difficult, in no small part because everyone’s reaction is different. But when an author uses rape as a plot device to get the story moving, pulls out the “rape = sex” fallacy, and doesn’t seem to indicate any physical or emotional effects on the character (save becoming a vampire, naturally) … well, for me it puts the book squarely into the “Doing it Wrong” category.
#
Comments and discussion welcome, as always.
Mirrored from Jim C. Hines.










Comments
Out of curiosity, what books are you reading/planning to read for your survey of urban fantasy?
Mostly I just want to get as good a feel for the subgenre as I can, both so I know what I'm working with, and also to put me in a better position to poke at some of the tropes :-)
Rape does not equal sex, it equals violence. Bleh.
And Jim, I'd be happy to email you a copy of my UF ms if you want :-)
You'd think this would be a pretty simple thing to understand, and yet...
Brain fart -- the GH plot thing?
Never stop talking about this Jim. You have my never-ending respect for doing so.
And I had enough "rape is romance" for a lifetime after struggling through "Atlas Shrugged"'s first 500 pages, thank you.
The fact is, we are trying to create a safe and fun environment at Penguicon, and if everyone who has a wireless device (hello, that's everyone at the con!) sees that the moment they try to connect, that's a problem.
Agreed. And most of the staff and volunteers at Penguicon are awesome people.
I wouldn't have considered the possibility of it being a Penguicon network if I hadn't overheard that rumor. I'm dubious, but since I haven't gotten an official yes or no, I just don't know.
Or, I don't know if anyone here reads yaoi manga, but they usually put me off with their "No, no, please, no, oh this feels so good!" approach to sex.
Why so warped, world?
(Trigger Warning for drugged rape.)
One of the things that bugged me about Keri Arthur's Riley Jensen series (paranormal romance/urban fantasy) was that in the first book, Full Moon Rising, Riley is drugged by one of her lovers and raped. Repeatedly (though we only "see" it happen once and later learn he's been doing it for months). Riley talks about feeling violated and everyone is in agreement that a crime was committed, but never once is it ever called rape. I am pretty certain at least they don't call it sex either (it's been awhile since I read it), and it is definitely never portrayed as being anything positive. There is talk of rape, but it happens to other women, never to Riley.
Honestly, I really do enjoy the series and found Riley (who is half vampire/werewolf) never fell into the "I'm super strong, but I need a man to get me out of danger!" She was often the one saving her brother's butt or working equally alongside other men to get the job done. Definitely not a perfect series by any stretch of the imagination, but an excellent guilty pleasure.
With "The Becoming," as I was reading it ... I don't think the author did this deliberately, and I could be reading into it, but in some ways it almost felt like the character was being "put in her place." She's the only strong woman in the book -- heck, she's named Strong -- and from the very start we're shown that she's not strong enough to protect herself from a man.
Again, I don't think this was the author's intent, but it made that part of the story even more unpleasant.
Just a thought.
Also said during that conversation, "Uh oh! Don't tell Jim!" :-)
I heard about this comment, and debated including it in the post, but it didn't quite fit with the tone.
But I was amused by the comment...
Just...wow. That's just...even if the WiFi name was supposed to be "edgy," or somehow connected with/riffing off "freeporn" or something, that's obscene and uncalled for.
...and that book sounds like it would raise my hackles instantly. Dear god. I'm editing a novella for an anthology right now that deals with rape, in which the victim takes quite a lot of the blame upon herself, but it's a historical fantasy in which the victim, a scullery maid, is raped by her employer. In historical context, her mental revising and excuses are very plausible, and very heartbreaking. And yes, it does set up a good bit of the rest of the story, but it's handled...deftly, and painfully, and realistically (as realistically as you can get in Wonderland).
But plot device + [rape=sex] + no repercussions or emotional fallout = total fail. ARGH.
Patricia Briggs' Mercy Thompson series is a really fun urban fantasy with a strong female lead. I like how she's dealing with the sexual assualt issue (I think it's 3 or 4 books into the series), which is partly because she's actually dealing with it, it didn't just mysteriously go away in the next installment.
Maybe. I've got a character I'm working with who's a borderline-parody, but I don't know how big a role he'll have or where exactly he's going to fit into the overall story.
[also: people are often assholes, and use "can't you take a joke?" as a defense against being called on their assholery.]
OTOH, warning us is a HUGE service and one that I thank you for - it's not a trope that I'd want to see in things I read if I can help it.
I hadn't thought of it in terms of 9/11, but I have had this come up repeatedly in situations where I couldn't believe I had to explain to a boyfriend precautions that were just natural to me when he failed to take them on my behalf. (e.g. leaving a hotel room door open for visiting friends while we showered.)
This. This right here is why I will throw a book against the wall. I see these two mistakes way too often, and in all kinds of genres.
Thank you for writing so well, and so often about this subject. I'm sad that it's necessary, but I'm glad for you and your posts.
I have mixed feelings about the series, but the Rachel Morgan books are interesting by Kim Harrison. I don't know if Kim was meaning to, but she outlines an abusive relationship very well between two female characters. The stories are first person and the reactions by Rachel are pretty much what I've heard from people I've known trapped in abusive relationships.
Of course, the abusive character is a "vampire", she "can't help it", and Rachel uses all the tired excuses to avoid facing the truth.
My wife and I listen to them on audiobook during long trips. Don't know if I'd have the patience to read them. No offense to Ms. Harrison, but the writing is hit or miss, though I see progression in her plot arcs and the character development feels real too.