I had a “Duh” moment at ICON last weekend. We were talking about conventions and fandom and such during a panel - maybe the gaming panel? - and someone in the audience commented that overall, fandom tended to be pretty accepting and inclusive.
It’s a claim I’ve heard a lot, and I think we as a community tend to pride ourselves on our inclusiveness. Heck, I mentioned in my speech at Worldcon how finding fandom felt like coming home, how I felt accepted and valued here in a way I never did back in high school.
And therein lies the logical flaw, which hadn’t quite crystallized in my mind until that conversation at ICON. Because fandom is not a utopia of acceptance and tolerance. True, it’s a place where I found acceptance. But the fact that I as a straight white male geek feel accepted and relatively safe here does not therefore prove that this is a safe or accepting community.
After all, the other place I felt accepted growing up was in the Boy Scouts…
I love this community, and I think we’ve made progress, but we have a long way to go. Most conventions I attend are still at least 95% white. Women continue to get harassed while men stand around asking why people have to make such a big deal about sexual harassment policies. Awards and “Best of” anthologies continue to be dominated by western (particularly U.S.) names. Our book covers fetishize women and whitewash or erase characters of color. And people who speak up about feeling excluded are accused of being oversensitive, searching for reasons to be offended, and being part of the PC police.
Fandom is accepting of a different subset of people than most other parts of my life, and as a member of that subset, I’m grateful. But I also think we have a lot more work to do to broaden that acceptance.
Mirrored from Jim C. Hines.










Comments
... which can be a bad thing, since accepting that there's a difference between the person who will not shut up about Doctor Who and the person who makes lewd comments at strangers* is important. The first person is occasionally annoying, but he's generally someone who we want to include, because... well, part of being a fan is being really passionate into things, and Doctor Who is one of those things that SF fans like. At worst, he might need a panel mod to remind him to let others ask questions or that this is the Firefly panel, and perhaps he can talk about this in the hotel bar later.
The second person needs to be told that he is welcome only as long as he does not make others unwelcome; and that means reserving the lewd comments to people who expressed interest in such things first.
(Actually both the panel moderator making sure that everyone gets heard and the security guard/con anti-harassment rules are aspects of the same thing, which is that we should include all people* but not all behaviors at all times. It's just that the first fan is more likely to just annoy people, while the second fan may scare people.)
* Or all people who aren't dis-including others by their behaviors.
I hope I'll have fun too, but it'd be naive to think it'll come without difficulties.
A con bid I'm working with brought back a reports that entrances and routes and rooms are "accessible" but I want to make sure the hotel's definition of that word jibes with the real needs of a modern fan. They also listed the entrance to "accessible" rooms as 32" wide, which didn't sound very accessible to me...
(If not, I totally understand. Not your responsibility to educate the community. But I'm working on a fanzine issue right now and would publish soonish)
Fandom is, as you said, inclusive of DIFFERENT people than the "mainstream world." But it isn't really inclusive of ALL people. I think there are strides being made in the right direction, with more cons holding to strict harassment policies, and such. But there's progress yet to be made.
I work in academia. I'd say the same about my academic circle with all the same qualifications.
Then every so often I have to go do business outside the uni/fandom...
and remember that actually, fandom/academia is so far ahead that I end up suffering time shock as I find myself plummeted back to the 1970s.
I'm better at dancing than most people, but I'm never gonna get hired as a professional, or even get on So You Think You Can Dance.
All wonderful aspects that I am saddened to have written in past tense. Right around 2008, the tone of conventions started changing. Little things at first. I'm a costumer so I got some cat-calling. Photographers asking me to pose in uncomfortable positions. I was never harassed "too much" or assaulted or stalked like some of my friends were, probably because having my husband nearby is a great shield for that kind of behavior. No, what really bothers me is the sense of elitism at conventions. If I didn't like the same writer/tv show/movies/art as the other attendees, suddenly I was being treated as if I wasn't good enough, wasn't fan enough, to attend "their" convention. I'm "one of the gang" while we're debating the literary significance of Philip K. Dick and John Crowley, but if I try to compare the writing of Neil Gaiman to Satoshi Kon's movies, suddenly I need to be re-educated into fandom. Oops, I've just let slip that I respect and value anime and manga as an art form. Now I'm one of "those people," a lesser, pitiable creature who hath strayed from the path of the righteous and true fandom, and must change her ways or be exiled to those little anime cons that the ignorant kiddies go to.
I am not kidding. I have been belittled, repeatedly, for including anime and manga into my fandom. The sexual harassment I have some defenses for, but to have my all my contributions to a conversation on the social and scientific ramifications of being able to identify, detect, and transport the human soul as hypothesized in "Vectors" by Michael P. Kube-McDowell or "Biting the Sun" by Tanith Lee become suddenly irrelevant because I have the audacity to compare these books to Ed and Al's sacrifices in their attempt to use forbidden magic to bring their mother back from the dead in "Fullmetal Alchemist," my brain implodes and my tiny feelings are crushed.
Sorry, got really long winded there, which illustrates how important this issue is to me. Unfortunately, because of this type of elitism, I no longer find it fun to go to sci-fi/fantasy conventions. It hurts too much to know I had the camaraderie of convention goers before I discovered anime, but because I expanded my horizons, it's like I'm the Andromeda Strain.
As for the belittling of anime/manga fans, ugh. I just don't get that. But hey, maybe that helps to explain why most anime/manga conventions are getting bigger and more popular every year, while so many SF/F cons are struggling to stay afloat.
Not that it excuses egregious behavior by any means; just that I can see where the notion springs from (and keeps perennially springing from, as more people find the community).
Logicfail, but a common one.
Several years ago, someone wrote about the five geek social fallacies, which I think still apply today. The whole 'we are so inclusive!' thing means that sometimes there is pressure to accept even those who are, y'know, massive douchebags.
I tend to lie to myself that SFF fandom is more accepting than it is, because I self-select. I read blogs like yours or ones that have a social justice bent to them, and I surround myself with real life friends who won't belittle my concerns about under- or misrepresentation. And so I tell myself that fandom is progressive and Thinks About Things and listens to people and I go on my way, whistling merrily. . . until I stumble across a comment thread that makes me physically hurt inside with the stupidity and racism and sexism and oh did I mention the stupidity?
My first foray into larger fandom was when I started blogging this year, where I write a fair bit about gender and race, and one of the first things I realized was that no matter how much I might value changing minds, there's a huge part of me that's perfectly happy to keep my readership in a comfortable little circle of people who won't cause me to waste hours flailing in rage. Which feels cowardly, but . . . (I made a post early on expressing disappointment in how race and gender were handled in Redshirts, which I or other people linked to a few places in fandom where it was discussed very rationally, and Scalzi himself stopped by with a very respectful response . . . and then there was a, shall we say, hyper-trollish discussion of it in one fannish place that I just. Could not. Fathom. It was like a bucket of cold water with the, "I like to interact with people in fandom, but . . . I like my corner of it better" realization.) There's a point at which the frustration becomes not worth it. And I think that's why certain subsets of fandom have tried to carve out safe spaces for themselves, particularly online, places within fandom where they can find their own "acceptance" . . . and it's a shame that this is necessary. And then, of course, there are realms (like publishing) and levels of interaction in fandom (like cons) where self-selecting becomes impractical or impossible . . .
tl;dr: Parts of fandom are amazing, but other parts are broken and horrible, and it's wonderful and cathartic to hear people acknowledge that and say we should fix it. So thank you. Again.
p.s. -- Also, it would be nice if all those straight white male cis dudes who have gone their whole lives upset about "not fitting in" because of SFF interests would consider what it's like to "not fit in" in the mainstream because of SFF interests AND find oneself a tiny minority in a fandom that seems like a like-minded utopia to others.
Also, it would be nice if all those straight white male cis dudes who have gone their whole lives upset about "not fitting in" because of SFF interests would consider what it's like to "not fit in" in the mainstream because of SFF interests AND find oneself a tiny minority in a fandom that seems like a like-minded utopia to others.
I definitely wish more people would make that leap.
Do you happen to have a link to your review of Redshirts? I'm curious to read your thoughts there.
Jim, it might be time to have a "pump up the volume" thread where you invite people to link to thoughtful blog entries and roundups about acceptance issues, perhaps putting a time limitation on it to the last two years so readers *know* it's all about the current situation.