?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Arguing Book Piracy

Last week, I saw a lot of authors linking to “Free” Books Aren’t Free, a blog post by author Saundra Mitchell talking about the costs of book piracy.

Let me state up front that illegally downloading books is stealing.  If you’re doing it, at least have the guts to admit you’re committing theft instead of spouting off excuses.

That said, I disagree with some of Mitchell’s reasoning.  She argues:

If even HALF of those people who downloaded my book that week had bought it, I would have hit the New York Times Bestseller list. If the 800+ downloads a week of my book were only HALF converted into sales, I would earn out in one more month.

Yes, and if my dogs pooped gold, I could quit my day job.  But it ain’t going to happen.  Author Scott Nicholson guesses that 10,000 illegal downloads equates to maybe 5 lost sales.  I suspect he’s underestimating, and the true numbers are somewhere between his and Mitchell’s, but I don’t think there’s any way to say for certain.  I’m just not buying the argument that half of those downloaders would have actually bought Mitchell’s book (particularly since we’re talking about a hardcover.)

She goes on to say:

[M]y book is never going to be available in your $region, not for lack of trying. My foreign rights agent is a genius at what she does, and has actively tried to sell it everywhere- UK, AU, China, France, you name it, she tried to sell it there.  SHADOWED SUMMER will only be coming out in Italy, because that’s the only place there’s a market for it.

The implication being that piracy killed her chances at foreign sales?  I’m confused on this one.  Does the availability of a pirated English book really reduce demand for a Chinese edition of said book?  I suppose it’s possible … most countries are more multilingual than the U.S.  But it’s a stretch, and I’m not convinced.

[T]he sales figures on SHADOWED SUMMER had a seriously detrimental effect on my career. It took me almost two years to sell another book. I very nearly had to change my name and start over. And my second advance? Was exactly the same as the first because sales figures didn’t justify anything more.

The thing that makes me hesitate here is that piracy is an across-the-board problem.  Every commercially published author’s books end up on torrent sites.  Some authors are still doing quite well.  Others, not so much.  So does it make sense for struggling authors to blame book pirates for low sales when other authors are selling well despite said pirates?

Mitchell says a lot I agree with, too.  If you can’t afford books, go to the library.  Try to get review copies.  Or maybe if you can’t afford the books, you just don’t get them.  Wanting a book doesn’t give you the right to steal it.

I agree with her that, “People who illegally download books are more interested in their convenience than in supporting the authors they want to read.”

I’m NOT saying book piracy is harmless.  (To authors or to readers either, for that matter.  Laura Anne Gilman recently pointed out another example of a torrent site installing malware with downloads.)  Bottom line, it’s a dickish thing to do.

And it does hurt authors.  How much, I don’t know.  I suspect it will hurt us more in coming years, as electronic reading becomes more widespread and book scanning technology improves.  Lost productivity alone is a serious cost for authors who try to keep up with DMCA notifications to various sites.

It pisses me off when I find people illegally sharing my books online.  And I think it’s important to educate readers.  But I don’t think it helps our cause to distort or exaggerate the problem.

Discussion welcome and appreciated.  I expect some disagreement on this one, and as always, I reserve the right to change my mind.

Mirrored from Jim C. Hines.

Comments

rosencrantz23
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:00 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
discounted books still generate royalties, typically. Bargain bin copies -- the hardbacks for $5 and such -- do not.

That said, authors don't earn royalties on used book sales, either, nor library check-outs.

All three of these, however, do put the author's work in the hands of more readers who are then more likely to go out and buy copies of the book -- and future books -- generating royalties for the author in the long run.
law_nerd
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:20 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Libraries do buy books, so if a title is popularly demanded, library purchases generate royalties too.

Also, small correction -- U.S. authors don't earn royalties on library check outs. There are countries, including Canada and Australia, where libraries keep track of what is being loaned out, and authors (citizens) can get an annual check from the government. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Lending_Right for more info.)
jimhines
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:28 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Yep. And personally, I'd love to see the U.S. get on board with that, but I don't see it happening any time soon.
serialbabbler
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:59 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Given funding issues at the moment, it would probably result in fewer libraries.* (Unless they started charging a fee for checkouts, in which case it would probably result in fewer book circulations.) Point-of-sale royalties are easier because they don't represent an ongoing expense.

*Especially given that a lot of libraries are closing as it is.
mtlawson
Jan. 18th, 2011 07:34 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Me either.

I suspect we'll be lucky in Ohio if library funding is slashed only an additional 30% the next two years.

I find it sad that the same people who complain about smut, violence, and what-have-you on television are also the same people so gung-ho about cutting alternatives out of the state budget, like libraries. Or the people who complain about Ohio losing it's competitve edge also wanting to cut education budgets to justify tax cuts. (Hello? McFly? How do Ohioans get a competitve edge if they don't have good schools?)
Re: My .02 - georgmi - Jan. 18th, 2011 08:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: My .02 - mtlawson - Jan. 18th, 2011 08:59 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: My .02 - georgmi - Jan. 18th, 2011 09:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
rosencrantz23
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:36 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
You're right, and I'm at fault for over-condensing what I meant to say.

Libraries do buy copies of the books they lend, which generates royalties to the author. American libraries, unlike the Canadian and Australian examples you cite, do not pay further royalties on the number of times the book circulates.

(Libraries do have to pay copyright fees on journal and magazine articles under several circumstances, though I never learned if any of that goes to the article authors or just the publisher when we covered that in library school.)
cainle_bean
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:43 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
well you did say they did not earn royalties on library check outs. I took that to mean after the book was bought by the library. Hmm I used to wonder how libraries got all those books, and who decided what to buy.
Re: My .02 - rosencrantz23 - Jan. 18th, 2011 03:52 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: My .02 - julieandrews - Jan. 18th, 2011 07:02 pm (UTC) - Expand
Re: My .02 - finnyb - Jan. 19th, 2011 03:06 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: My .02 - rosencrantz23 - Jan. 19th, 2011 04:09 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: My .02 - finnyb - Jan. 20th, 2011 12:17 am (UTC) - Expand
Re: My .02 - rosencrantz23 - Jan. 18th, 2011 03:55 pm (UTC) - Expand
cathshaffer
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:56 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
I've never heard of a magazine contract that paid royalties. Magazine publication is pretty much always a first rights or copyright transfer arrangement, if the author gets paid. For scientific journals, the authors do not get paid at all. Typically, they pay the journal a fee to publish the article.
Re: My .02 - rosencrantz23 - Jan. 18th, 2011 03:58 pm (UTC) - Expand
julieandrews
Jan. 18th, 2011 06:56 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Dang. One more reason to move to Canada.
tinylegacies
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:38 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Authors have *already* received their royalties on a book that is in a used bookstore when it was initially purchased. The difference between that and pirated e-books is that they *never* receive royalties for the pirated books.
ankewehner
Jan. 18th, 2011 04:34 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Er... someone had to buy either a hardcopy to scan, or an ebook to crack the DRM of, before a file can be spread, no?

(Mind, I see how copies and copies may make A LOT less bought "source"-books per X downloads, compared withbought library books per X checkouts. Just splitting hairs a bit.)
georgmi
Jan. 18th, 2011 08:35 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Even with the original source having been purchased, the royalty-per-copy very quickly drives to the point where it is indistinguishable from zero.
cathshaffer
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:55 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
Libraries often buy quite a lot of copies of popular new releases.
rosencrantz23
Jan. 18th, 2011 03:56 pm (UTC)
Re: My .02
yup, and then weed out most of them within 6 months to a year, once demand has died down for it.
mary_j_59
Jan. 23rd, 2011 03:32 am (UTC)
Re: My .02
As a librarian and an aspiring writer, I have to make a slight correction here. Libraries are often among the biggest markets for mid-list authors; we do buy books, and in multiple formats. So there is a sale there, too. It's far better to take a book out from the library than it is to steal it!

Profile

Snoopy
jimhines
Jim C. Hines
Website

Tags

Page Summary

Latest Month

November 2019
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow