?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

The Broken Kingdoms and The Sagan Diary

Subterranean Press was kind enough to hand out copies of John Scalzi’s novelette The Sagan Diary [Amazon | B&N | Subterranean Press] at ConFusion this year. As the title suggests, the book is a collection of mental diary-style entries from Jane Sagan of Scalzi’s Old Man’s War universe.

The book begins with a preface from Lieutenant Gretchen Schafer, an analyst involved in reviewing and transcribing BrainPal memories from Special Forces soldiers like Sagan. Written as a letter of protest, Schafer complains that “what we have to work with are data-poor bits in which Lt. Sagan thinks about what appears to be a romantic partner of some sort…” She describes the files as “of some anthropological interest … but for our purposes these files are near useless.”

I read this as a nicely-done warning to the reader: this is not Old Man’s War. This is not action-heavy space battles and supersoldiers. It’s the musings and philosophizing and reflections of a soldier. A rather loving character study. It’s almost poetic at times:

I am not Death. I am killing; I am the verb. I am the action, I am the performance. I am the movement that cuts the spine; I am the mass which pulps the brain. I am the headsnap ejecting consciousness into the air.

I am not Death but she follows close behind…

It’s a fairly quick read, and an interesting change from the other things I’ve read by Scalzi. I definitely recommend reading his Old Man’s War books for context.

#

I also just finished reading N. K. Jemisin’s The Broken Kingdoms [Amazon | B&N | Mysterious Galaxy], book two of the Inheritance Trilogy.

I liked Jemisin’s first book a lot, but it’s been almost two years since I read it, and unfortunately my memory of the details from that first book were a little fuzzy, because my brain leaks. The Broken Kingdoms works as a standalone, but I think I would have gotten even more out of it if I had the first story clear and fresh in my brain.

This is set ten years after The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms. From the back cover:

In the city of Shadow, beneath the World Tree, alleyways shimmer with magic and godlings live hidden among mortalkind. Oree Shoth, a blind artist, takes in a strange homeless man on an impulse. This act of kindness engulfs Oree in a nightmarish conspiracy. Someone, somehow, is murdering godlings … and Oree’s guest is at the heart of it.

Oree is a fascinating character. While blind to the mundane world, she can see magic, and can perform magic of her own through her paintings and drawings. She is not a typical fantasy warrior or kick-ass heroine. Like all of Jemisin’s characters, she feels very real, with her own struggles and desires, her own history and scars.

Heartfelt. That’s the word I’ve been struggling with as I work on this review. Jemisin’s writing feels heartfelt. She understands and loves this world, these characters, and it shows.

Shiny, the homeless man who refuses to speak, was particularly interesting. He appears mortal most of the time, but is unable to die (permanently, at least - think of a glowing Jack Harkness), and manifests powerful magic when protecting Oree. He’s arrogant and rude, but even before you learn his backstory, you can tell he’s also lost in the world.

Lil is another great character, a godling who is both disturbing and fun. (I just realized why I like her. At one point she unselfconsiously devours the bodies of the dead, because that’s just what she is. She’s like a superpowerful version of my goblins with scary-big teeth.)

Storywise, it was fascinating to see some of the fallout from the events of the first book, and to learn more about the history of the gods and the godlings. There’s a fair amount of action as Oree struggles against enemies with the power to kill godlings … perhaps even to kill the gods themselves. It gets pretty dark and intense for a while toward the end, but the ending works. A story of mortals warring against themselves and the gods isn’t the newest idea in fantasy, but ideas are easy. It’s the execution - the thoughtfulness, the characterization, the history - that make this book work.

I’m having a hard time talking about the book in more detail without spoiling things. So I’ll just say this is the second of Jemisin’s books I’ve read, and I’m looking forward to picking up her third.

Mirrored from Jim C. Hines.

Comments

( 11 comments — Leave a comment )
mtlawson
Mar. 25th, 2012 02:46 am (UTC)
I'm amused, Jim. You know what I'd picked up from the library the other day? The first four episodes of Cosmos.
(Deleted comment)
jimhines
Mar. 25th, 2012 01:25 pm (UTC)
What was it that felt messed up, and do you know what it is about her writing that makes you keep reading anyway?
(Deleted comment)
jimhines
Mar. 25th, 2012 11:36 pm (UTC)
That's too bad.

Yeah, I would buy it just for "an entire book about Sieh." He's another of her characters I really like.
ambyr
Mar. 27th, 2012 12:29 pm (UTC)
I would say (as someone who really liked the first two books in the series and really wanted to like the third) that Kingdom tried to cover too much, too fast. I think it could have been the strongest book of the series with one more rewrite that either drastically pruned it or split it in two. As is, I think it's worth reading if you like the series, but it makes me a little sad for what it might have been.
caper_est
Mar. 25th, 2012 08:53 am (UTC)
I thought Hundred Thousand Kingdoms was great, and I'm seriously looking forward to getting onto the sequel - which is slowly rising to the front of my To-Be-Read shelf. Thanks for whetting the appetite, and for putting another bean into the "First, do the re-read!" pot. That's always a tricky decision: some books it makes a lot more difference to than others, and there's a wide grey area in which my instincts aren't reliable.
jimhines
Mar. 25th, 2012 01:20 pm (UTC)
I don't know that the reread is a requirement for everyone, but my memory doesn't hold on to story details that well, and there were parts where I knew I was missing something but didn't figure out what until later...
inverarity
Mar. 25th, 2012 02:47 pm (UTC)
I liked The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms. I thought The Broken Kingdoms revealed Jemisin was hitting her limits as a writer. I haven't read book three yet, but I am planning to, though not with expectations as high as when I read book two.
jimhines
Mar. 25th, 2012 02:51 pm (UTC)
Re: hitting her limits, how so?
inverarity
Mar. 25th, 2012 03:18 pm (UTC)
Basically, I thought The Broken Kingdoms was pretty much book one, recycled.
jazzfish
Mar. 25th, 2012 03:51 pm (UTC)
It’s almost poetic at times

Funny thing about that.
jimhines
Mar. 25th, 2012 10:22 pm (UTC)
I guess that would account for it, eh?

I feel all observant and perceptive now :-)
( 11 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

Snoopy
jimhines
Jim C. Hines
Website

Tags

Latest Month

November 2019
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow